Littleton Public Schools students performed well on the first online math and English language arts state assessment tests, scoring significantly higher than the state average and the PARCC national average in all grades and subjects tested. The Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) test assesses grades 3 through 11 in math and English language arts. These tests were given for the first time statewide last April. These are our first online state assessments in math and English language arts. They replace the former state assessments, Transitional Colorado Assessment Program (TCAP).
Colorado’s state assessments recently changed in order to accurately assess student mastery of the updated Colorado Academic Standards. With the standards being more focused, coherent and rigorous, assessments must adapt to align with the standards. These CMAS tests incorporate new English language arts and mathematics assessments developed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). It was required that all Colorado school districts give these new assessments beginning in the 2014-2015 school year. Scores are now delineated by English language arts and mathematics, and no longer by reading, writing and math.
The new English language arts assessment and the new math assessment measure a more complex set of skills including critical thinking, persuasive writing, and problem solving using tools not available with paper and pencil tests. The expectation is that the online version of the test mirrors instruction that takes place in the classroom.
The scoring categories are also different because they reflect the new rubric and different scoring designations. Instead of Unsatisfactory, Partially Proficient, Proficient, and Advanced, the designations are Did Not Meet Expectations, Partially Met Expectations, Approaching Expectations, Met Expectations, and Exceeded Expectations.
When a new test is introduced, a new baseline is set and the expectation is that scores will drop considerably because there are new standards being assessed and there is a new testing environment—online instead of paper/pencil. As was expected, LPS scores are significantly lower than in the past. This drop in scores is reflected across the country where the PARCC test has been administered. This does not mean that LPS students are learning less or that the schools are doing a poor job of educating students. The former Transition Colorado Academic Performance (TCAP) tests were based on the previous Colorado Model Content Standards and were far less rigorous than the new CMAS/PARCC tests, which are based on the new Colorado Academic Standards (CAS).
Comparing the two sets of standards and the two assessments that are designed to measure them are like comparing apples and oranges. They are two totally different types of tests and a comparison is not valid. The new standards were developed by Colorado educators along with content specialists and assessment experts and are designed to make sure all students are on the path to college and career readiness.
Because this is the first year of a significantly different test, growth data will not be available until after the 2016 tests are administered and scored. This is also the first time that Colorado is taking a multi-state test. The PARCC Consortia is made up of 5 million students in 11 states, including Colorado and the District of Columbia.
According to LPS director of learning services Patti Turner, this transition year provides Colorado with a new baseline set of scores that will inform instruction as we move forward. LPS deputy superintendent Connie Bouwman agrees. “Based on the increased rigor of the Colorado Academic Standards, our district-level scores are aligned with our expectations. Overall, we are pleased. While these scores are certainly not where we ultimately want them to be, they show significant promise,” said Bouwman. “We see areas where the standards are clearly understood with instructional strategies in place. We also see areas we need to focus on to better support teachers as they work with the new standards and develop instructional strategies that will help our students be successful. Our teachers’ continued commitment to excellence is second to none.”
Highlights of district-level scores include:
Highlights of school-level scores include:
Non participation was a factor in LPS and was greatest at the high school level. At the elementary level, 3% of students in grades 3 through 5 did not participate in the assessment. At the middle school level, 15% of students did not participate. At the high school level, 60% of students grades 9 through 11 did not participate in the assessment, which means that high school scores represent only 40% of LPS students in grades 9 through 11. This limits our teachers’ ability to make instructional decisions and student placements in intervention or accelerated programs. Non participation also limits the ability of school and district leaders to judge the effectiveness of instructional programs.